much to my pleasant surprise, Nelio and Reckless are posting again.... and just in time, too. i was this close (holds thumb and index finger ~1mm apart dramatically) to besmirching their good names for being blog deserters ('post pussies'), and casting them down as only one with abandonment issues + megalomania + my strictly-one-sided bitching platform could cast a person down. And if you haven't noticed (you insensitive bastards, you), Pete's blog is starting to branch into broader topics - which my manservant-Ewok tells my illiterate ass - includes links to swank new books and music.
since we're all back in blogtown (as the literary equivalent to aging fraternity brothers assembled for a 5 year college reunion, scoping out the sweet, sweet undergrad-jailbait-blog-ass we used to score), dare i suggest we shark it up a bit? bring back the bicker? rekindle the babbling cockjockeying that the blog monologue affords us ('monoblogologue' : the blissful prohibition of dialogue and discourse.... sir, you are out of order! (post) - (add a comment) no, you sir are out of order (post your comments) - (add a comment) how dare you, sir (post your comments) - (add a comment) how dare you, sir (post your comments)).
Reckless, i must insist you restrain yourself from yack yack yacking away about the law. it's neither funny, nor entertaining, and i don't think i'm alone in saying this, but no one really thinks laws do anything but keep me from waving my penis at passing traffic. we're all lawbreakers here, bitches... in fact, how many of you are smoking pot right now? right now. hell, Prince Harry's sniffing bumps of blow off some hooker's ass in my living room right now. and it's a dead hooker. so much for your silly laws against blow, or hookers, or killing a hooker, or keeping royalty chained to the couch in your living room with only blow and a dead hooker to keep me entertained him alive.
so can we all, then, agree that the only time The Law entertains us is when i'm making fun of it? ...and dead hookers are totally hilarious....
welcome back, bitches. oh, and Reg, you're on notice. don't think i've forgotten about you, you cheeky monkey, you.
4.02.2006
BTW
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
hello! i'm still here! faithfully reading you handsome devil, you. in the spirit of blogologue discourse and the british monarchy, i propose the following topic for debate:
PRINCE HARRY: True Windsor, or illegitimate love child?
look at a pic of him next to Prince and Chuck and try to tell me they share DNA. there's no way.
plus, at parties he's known to shout, "hey ladies! who wants to shag a prince?"
what honest prince would say THAT? sheesh.
i can't prove it, but i think scott stapp is involved somehow...
Post a Comment